Software License Management: Tips, Tools, and Key Features
Table of Contents ToggleIT Controls a Decreasing Amount of SaaS Quantity...
Back
Back
Search for Keywords...
Blog
Table of Contents
SaaS has experienced steady growth over the last decade. And then the COVID-19 pandemic kickstarted that growth as organizations scrambled to provide their employees with the SaaS tools they needed to remain connected and productive when working from home.
Cloud growth has accelerated and isn’t expected to slow down anytime soon. Gartner predicts global end-user SaaS spending will reach $244B in 2024, a 18.9% increase from 2023.
And while we’re seeing the explosive growth of SaaS continue, we’re also seeing the continuation of another key SaaS-related trend. Decentralization of SaaS purchasing continues to be more and more common. Specifically, IT teams are controlling less and less of both SaaS spend and the quantity of apps within the organization.
Here at Zylo, we have unmatched visibility into SaaS use and spend. Our Discovery Engine has processed more than $1T in spend, and more than $34B in total SaaS spend. We’re constantly monitoring for key trends — and share those insights so businesses like yours can unlock the full power of your SaaS investments. Read on to see what we found and what it means for your business.
Become a SaaS Management Superhero
Learn MoreWhen on-premises software was king, software purchases were typically made by the IT team. But the rise of SaaS has caused a dramatic shift in who purchases and manages software.
By its nature, SaaS is easy to acquire; it’s often as easy as supplying a credit card number. So it’s not uncommon for applications to be purchased throughout a given organization. As such, IT controls a rapidly decreasing portion of SaaS spend and application quantity.
According to the SaaS Management Index, today IT owns 28% of SaaS spend and 17% of applications. And as this share of SaaS decreases, business units account for more SaaS spend and quantity than ever before. Today, business units own 69% of SaaS spend. SaaS applications purchased and expensed by individual employees are now at 3% of SaaS spend.
This shift in SaaS spend and ownership away from IT and to business units and individuals has been happening for some time. And it’s not even necessarily a bad thing.
On one hand, it puts purchasing power directly into the hands of users – departments, teams and employees – to buy the technology and tools they need to be productive and effective. And many would argue that this increases organizational agility, allowing business units and employees to make faster technology decisions and introduce new innovation into their organizations.
On the flipside, this continued trend of decentralization does reduce the amount of IT oversight and governance of SaaS within an organization. And this poses all kinds of risks as unmonitored SaaS growth can lead to inefficient spend, unnecessary costs, and security and compliance risks.
Evolving Your SaaS Governance Framework for the Digital Workplace
Learn MoreSo what does this mean for IT teams? In the wake of the pandemic, rise of remote work and the future of hybrid work, the right software has become essential to driving the effectiveness of both employees and the business.
But make no mistake: even as SaaS continues to grow, IT teams still have an important role to play in portfolio rationalization and ensuring application security and compliance.
We expect that this trend of SaaS decentralization will continue for many years, as business units and individuals make more purchasing decisions and continue to purchase and manage a greater share of an organization’s SaaS portfolio.
IT teams and line of business (LOB) owners must start working together as partners. And IT teams must gain full visibility into all SaaS in use at an organization — as well as who purchased each application. Only then are they able to establish effective processes and policies and provide guidance on purchasing and managing SaaS applications.
As SaaS portfolios grow — and IT continues to manage less of it — organizations are at greater risk of shadow IT. Essentially, Shadow IT refers to any software outside the ownership or control of centralized IT organizations.
Most SaaS applications can be easily purchased via credit card. So if a small team or employee needs fast access to a SaaS tool, it’s not uncommon for them to circumvent established processes and procedures, opting instead to charge the purchase and submit it for reimbursement.
As a result, shadow IT continues to grow both in terms of spend and quantity. In fact, Shadow IT spend has doubled year over year. And while shadow IT – SaaS applications purchased by individual employees – represents just 3% of SaaS spend, it accounts for 35% of application quantity. And it brings with it outsized implications.
Applications purchased via IT typically go through a vetting process to ensure they’re secure and compliant. However, applications purchased by employees on credit cards don’t go through this process. These unvetted apps put the organization at risk for large, costly consequences. In the US, the average cost of a data breach is $4.45B, including mitigation efforts and lost business.
More than ever, organizations must make it a priority to discover all SaaS applications in use — and then work to eliminate Shadow IT. Only then will they be able to fully manage risk. Learn how Zylo helps IT leaders do just that.
Table of Contents ToggleIT Controls a Decreasing Amount of SaaS Quantity...
Table of Contents ToggleIT Controls a Decreasing Amount of SaaS Quantity...
Table of Contents ToggleIT Controls a Decreasing Amount of SaaS Quantity...
Table of Contents ToggleWhat Is Automated Alerts?Old Alerts vs Automated AlertsAlert...
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |