Why Your Software Asset Management Tool Falls Short for Holistic SaaS Management
Table of Contents ToggleTop 15 Most Expensed Apps for 2023What Can...
Back
Back
Search for Keywords...
Blog
Table of Contents
In today’s fast-paced business landscape, the use of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications has become increasingly prevalent. Employees are increasingly expensing SaaS applications, with 7% of employees doing so in 2024. While that’s a 53% decrease from 2022, it’s still significant and poses problems for an organization.
Shadow IT is not only a source of uncontrolled spend and SaaS sprawl but also a source of risk, with 65% of expensed apps having “Poor” or “Low” security ratings via Netskope’s Cloud Confidence Index™. Expensed apps also result in $1.5M per year on average per company. This spending makes up only 3.4% of total expenses but still accounts for more than one-third of the SaaS portfolio.
These applications offer convenience, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, making them an attractive choice for employees. However, the rise of shadow IT – the use of unauthorized or unmanaged SaaS applications – has become a significant concern for organizations, leading to uncontrolled spend and security risks.
(by transaction volume)
This data is based on Zylo’s 2024 SaaS Management Index report. By examining these apps, we aim to shed light on the hidden costs of shadow IT and provide insights into how companies can better manage their SaaS stack.
Data shows that AI increasingly fuels employee app preferences. For the first time since Zylo started tracking this data, AI apps appear on the list of the most expensed apps.
In fact, ChatGPT’s appearance in the top 15 most expensed apps points to the growing appetite of employees for generative AI. The popularity of many of these apps (such as LinkedIn, Grammarly, Canva, Adobe, Kahoot, and SurveyMonkey) also coincide with the recent integration of AI functionalities.
Employee software preferences continue to change. The only app returning to the Top 5 is Kudoboard, while Adobe Acrobat fell from #2 to #7. And then there are apps that completely fell off the Top 5 list – Twilio, Mailchimp, and GoDaddy. Here’s a breakdown of the five most expensed apps in 2023.
As we mentioned, we’re seeing AI tools for the first time on our most-expensed apps list – specifically OpenAI API and ChatGPT.
Employees might pay for OpenAI APIs to access its advanced language processing capabilities and gain a competitive edge. On the other hand, ChatGPT is helpful for a broad spectrum of tasks. It’s being used for everything from generating creative ideas, writing social media posts, or crafting responses for customer support – among thousands of other possibilities.
While helpful for productivity and innovation, the unauthorized use of AI apps can lead to hidden costs and potential security risks for the organization. The unmanaged use of AI tools can lead to hidden costs, such as subscription fees or API usage charges. Additionally, using ChatGPT may introduce security risks, as employees may inadvertently share sensitive information with the tool or expose the company to potential data breaches.
In short, AI apps requires the same diligence as you would vetting any new software.
At Zylo, we believe effective SaaS Management requires continual discovery, active monitoring, and identification of all new SaaS expense purchases. Check out some ways to create a cloud governance framework and prevent expensed SaaS applications from costing your organization.
To mitigate these risks and better manage your SaaS stack, you must start with SaaS discovery. That means getting visibility into all the applications in your environment.:
How the Zylo Discovery Engine Powers the Most Comprehensive SaaS Management Platform
Learn MoreToday’s workers increasingly value flexibility. Allowing them to easily discover and select their preferred tools raises awareness of what software is available, increases utilization, and reduces shadow IT. Freedom within a Framework is a popular SaaS governance strategy that puts guardrails in place without hindering employee productivity. It sits between centralized and decentralized governance.
It starts by creating policies to curb rogue software purchases. Often that involves putting restrictions on expense purchases – either setting a dollar threshold for what may be expensed or banning them altogether. The route you choose depends on what makes sense for your business.
While policies get you off to a strong start, the key is in enforcing them. Visibility and education are key to making sure your policies work.
Offering employees an enterprise software store or application catalog helps them see what apps are available to them. Typically, the apps in your catalog are vetted and standardized software titles. If a tool is not listed, you can then provide guidance on how to properly request new purchases.
Education is also critical to enforcing governance. For instance, employees need to understand why you’ve taken this stance on software purchasing and usage. Help them understand the potential risks and costs associated with unauthorized app usage, and encourage the use of approved tools and platforms.
By addressing the underlying causes of shadow IT, businesses can ensure better control over their SaaS portfolio and maintain a secure and efficient IT environment.
Evolving Your SaaS Governance Framework for the Digital Workplace
Learn MoreFor many organizations, introducing more rigid governance around SaaS acquisition can keep expense spending in check. Your software approval process can be as simple as a quick form submission to request a new application.
Or, it can be as comprehensive as a software review board, involving a cross-collaborative team to review each new application request (e.g., Procurement, IT, Legal, and Accounting). While a review board may slow down the acquisition process and restrict who can acquire software, many Zylo customers say it effectively reduces shadow IT and expense spending.
Once you have governance in place, you can begin to eliminate shadow IT.
Start by identifying which apps you already have an enterprise agreement for. Then, check if licenses are available and migrate the user or users under that contract. Before canceling the other subscription, understand the terms and when you’re able to pull the plug.
If you don’t already have an enterprise agreement, notify end users they’ve purchased outside of policy and request they cancel the subscriptions. Next, direct them to your application catalog to select an already approved tool. If they’re unable to find a tool they need, provide direction on how to request the purchase of a new tool if that fits their needs better.
At this point, you’ve done all this hard work, the last thing you want is for shadow IT to creep back into your environment. Make sure you have proper monitoring in place so you’re alerted when a new app or payment comes in that is against your policies. Then you can take quick action, whether asking to cancel the subscription or not reimbursing them on future payments.
The rise of shadow IT and the increasing use of expensed SaaS applications highlight the need for organizations to gain a comprehensive understanding of their SaaS landscape. Your organization can better manage its SaaS stack, control spending, and improve overall security by addressing the hidden costs and risks associated with these applications. You can start achieving these goals by following the steps outlined in this article.
Do you know your organization’s most expensed SaaS applications? Employees expensing SaaS leads to shadow IT. Luckily, Zylo’s AI- and Machine Learning-powered Discovery Engine is unmatched at finding 100% of your SaaS — even those expensed apps hiding in the shadows. Schedule a demo and see how Zylo can go to work for you!
Table of Contents ToggleTop 15 Most Expensed Apps for 2023What Can...
Table of Contents ToggleTop 15 Most Expensed Apps for 2023What Can...
Table of Contents ToggleTop 15 Most Expensed Apps for 2023What Can...
Table of Contents ToggleHow to Build a Custom Dashboard from ScratchStep...
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |