
How to Build a Savings Pipeline for SaaS Renewals
Table of Contents ToggleWhat Is a SaaS Savings Pipeline?Why Managing SaaS...
Back
Back
Search for Keywords...
Blog

01/15/2026
Table of Contents
SaaS plays a bigger role in your organization every year, and that growth can make purchasing and managing these tools feel overwhelming. Decentralized buying, shifting pricing models, and rising security expectations all add pressure to keep costs under control and maintain a clear picture of what’s in your environment.
A structured SaaS procurement process helps you bring order to that complexity. With the right approach, you can streamline how new tools are evaluated, prevent unnecessary purchases, and ensure every application truly supports your goals. This guide will help you understand what SaaS procurement entails, why it’s worth investing in, and how to build a scalable process for choosing and managing the tools your teams rely on.
SaaS procurement is a strategic function that helps an organization evaluate, select, purchase, and manage software applications. It establishes standard processes that help:
When you approach SaaS procurement intentionally, you can:
Strong SaaS procurement gives you clearer control over cost, smoother operations, and fewer surprises across your tech stack. Key benefits include:
When you formalize how tools are requested, evaluated, and purchased, you set yourself up for better decision-making and more predictable outcomes. You also gain the visibility needed to manage risk and keep your SaaS environment aligned with your organization’s goals.
Structured procurement gives organizations visibility into their full SaaS portfolio, making it easier to identify duplicate tools, unused licenses, and unmonitored renewals. By validating needs upfront and reviewing usage data, teams avoid unnecessary spending and shift licenses to the right users at the right time.
Centralized processes also streamline vendor evaluation and negotiation, ensuring pricing aligns with actual consumption. Benchmark data and usage insights help buyers strengthen their position, reduce waste, and improve long-term ROI.
A defined procurement workflow allows teams to adopt new tools quickly without sacrificing control. Business units benefit from a consistent request path, faster approvals, and clear expectations around documentation and requirements.
As organizations grow, scalable procurement practices prevent SaaS overload by maintaining standards for evaluating new applications and consolidating tools when possible. This process improves efficiency and ensures technology evolves in step with strategic objectives.
A thoughtful SaaS procurement process gives you a clearer way to assess each vendor’s security posture, data-handling practices, and compliance commitments before you sign anything. Doing so helps you avoid tools that could expose sensitive information or create unnecessary risk.
When you build regular security checks into your workflow, you also reduce the chances of shadow IT slipping into your environment. Over time, this creates a stronger, more consistent governance baseline that protects your organization as your SaaS footprint grows.
Centralizing SaaS negotiations puts you in a stronger position at the contract table. With a clear view of pricing models, renewal structures, usage rights, SLAs, and exit terms, you can negotiate with more confidence and avoid committing to terms that don’t serve your long-term needs.
When you come to the table with solid data—such as market benchmarks or insights into how your teams actually use each tool—you can push back on price increases, ask for more flexible terms, and secure predictable costs year after year.
Even the most capable teams struggle to manage the rapid growth and complexity of SaaS environments. The most common pitfalls from decentralized buying to hidden costs can hinder visibility, inflate spend, and increase organizational risk.
Unmanaged purchasing by individual teams creates duplication, inconsistent contract terms, and significant security blind spots. Employees often expense tools without notifying IT or procurement, making it challenging to maintain accurate inventories or enforce standards. According to the 2025 SaaS Management Index, lines of business and employees are responsible for purchasing 73% of spend and 84% of applications. Shadow IT accounts for just 1% of total SaaS spend but represents 45% of all applications.

This level of decentralization expands risk exposure and leads to a fragmented stack. A clear procurement pathway—and visibility into existing tools—reduces unauthorized purchasing and helps teams select approved, secure applications.
Without centralized oversight, your organization will accumulate overlapping tools that provide similar functionality. Sprawl occurs quickly: the average company adds 7.6 net-new applications each month, contributing to more than 33% annual portfolio growth. At the same time, underutilization is widespread, with 53% of licenses unused.

This combination results in overspending, redundant subscriptions, and missed opportunities to optimize entitlements. Consistent governance and usage monitoring help organizations identify where tools can be consolidated, renegotiated, or retired.

Every new SaaS purchase introduces potential exposure—especially when evaluations are rushed or inconsistent. Due diligence is critical for tools that process sensitive data, integrate with core systems, or support regulated workflows. The 2025 SaaS Management Index reports that 51% of applications in the average portfolio have a Poor or Low risk score, meaning they pose meaningful security and compliance concerns.
A formal procurement process ensures security reviews are embedded early, reducing the chance of adopting high-risk or non-compliant vendors that could create regulatory or operational issues later.

Teams often select tools based solely on features, without validating long-term fit, scalability, financial stability, or roadmap alignment. Limited vendor assessment increases the likelihood of selecting tools that cannot support future needs, integrate properly, or maintain performance over time.
A balanced evaluation that considers functionality, technical compatibility, security posture, support quality, and pricing helps prevent misalignment and ensures tools evolve with the business.

Modern SaaS pricing models—particularly consumption-based and AI-driven models—introduce cost unpredictability. The average organization spends roughly $49 million on SaaS, yet 65% of IT leaders report unexpected charges tied to variable or usage-based billing.
Without clear visibility into how pricing scales, organizations risk exceeding budgets, misconfiguring entitlements, or paying for costly overages. Thorough contract review and usage monitoring reduce the chance of financial surprises.
Vendor lock-in becomes a real challenge when long-term contracts, proprietary integrations, or limited data portability make it difficult to move away from a tool that no longer fits your needs. When that happens, you lose negotiating power and face higher switching costs, which can slow your ability to adjust your stack as the business evolves.
You can protect yourself by reviewing exit terms, data ownership rights, and integration flexibility early in the procurement process. A little extra attention upfront gives you far more freedom and leverage down the road.
A SaaS tool only delivers value when people actually use it. If onboarding is too rushed or training isn’t clear, employees may struggle to understand the tool’s purpose or how it improves their work. That often leads to stalled adoption, underutilized licenses, and unnecessary spend.
You can avoid these issues by planning onboarding from the start of the procurement process. Clear guidance, accessible training, and ongoing support help your teams understand how to use the tool effectively and why it matters. When employees feel confident, adoption increases, and the tool becomes a meaningful part of your workflow.
A consistent, repeatable procurement workflow helps teams evaluate SaaS tools objectively, reduce duplication, and ensure every purchase supports business goals. The subsections below walk through the full lifecycle—from defining needs to managing contracts after purchase.
Every successful SaaS purchase starts with a clear understanding of the problem the business is trying to solve. Teams should outline several key elements before comparing vendors, including:
This process prevents reactive purchasing and ensures requests align with real priorities rather than individual preferences.
At this stage, it is also helpful to review the current SaaS environment to determine whether an existing tool already meets the need. Usage insights can show you underutilized licenses or overlapping applications, so you can avoid unnecessary spending and extend the value of tools already in the stack.
SaaS decisions often span multiple departments:
Aligning stakeholders early clarifies expectations, reduces surprises during review, and ensures each group can weigh in on requirements, risks, and constraints.
Governance frameworks outline who is involved, what documentation is required, and how decisions are made. This structure helps maintain consistency and prevents decentralized purchasing from creating shadow IT.
Once your company establishes clear requirements, teams can compare solutions based on several factors, including:
This stage should also include evaluating:
Collecting demos, trial access, or pilot programs helps confirm whether vendors can meet expectations in real-world scenarios. Clear scoring criteria allow procurement teams to evaluate options objectively and transparently.
Before purchasing, stakeholders need a well-supported business case. This includes estimating:
Cost-benefit analysis affects budget allocation and executive approval.
You can use spend and usage data from the existing stack to help organizations quantify consolidation opportunities or benchmark the proposed solution against current costs. Data-backed analyses strengthen credibility and show why the purchase is justified.
Security teams assess whether the tool meets organizational standards before contract negotiation begins. Review areas include:
Applications that access sensitive data require heightened scrutiny. This step ensures you avoid high-risk vendors and maintain compliance with internal and regulatory requirements.
With security clearance and a preferred vendor identified, procurement negotiates several key elements, including:
Clear exit terms and predictable renewal structures reduce the risk of unexpected cost increases or long-term lock-in. Your negotiation outcomes significantly affect the total cost of ownership, making this one of the most critical steps in the process.
Once you’ve selected a vendor and completed the required reviews, the purchase usually needs formal approval. This step protects your organization financially and reduces the risk of surprise spend or unapproved tools entering your environment. Many companies use a tiered approval structure, so higher-risk or higher-cost purchases receive the right level of scrutiny. You might need additional sign-off depending on factors such as:
A clear approval workflow also helps requests move efficiently through the right channels. Instead of wondering who needs to review what, you can route each request to the appropriate teams, such as:
This structure makes the process more predictable for everyone involved and ensures key details—like contracts, risk assessments, and cost justifications—are recorded and easy to reference later. Strong documentation becomes especially valuable during audits, renewals, or vendor evaluations down the line.
After approval, IT and the requesting team collaborate to:
This kind of structured implementation plan prevents delays and helps users gain value quickly.
After a solution is deployed, teams must monitor adoption, usage patterns, and license needs. This ongoing attention ensures entitlements match real demand and prevents waste. When usage drops or teams shift priorities, licenses may need to be reallocated, downsized, or consolidated. Partnering with IT and finance helps maintain visibility into spend and system usage, enabling continuous optimization.
SaaS procurement continues long after implementation. Ongoing responsibilities include:
These activities help organizations maintain control over long-term costs. Contract lifecycle management ensures renewals are negotiated proactively rather than occurring unnoticed or automatically. Historical usage, spend, and performance data help organizations make informed renewal decisions and maintain strong vendor relationships.
The Ultimate Guide for Wildly Effective SaaS Renewals
Learn MoreStrong SaaS procurement practices help organizations control spend, reduce risk, and make informed buying decisions. There are several practical methods for you and your team to improve consistency, strengthen governance, and maximize the value of your SaaS investments. Here’s how to begin:
Use clear requirements to help you and your team avoid reactive purchasing. This will ensure every request aligns with a defined business need. Before reviewing vendors, document:
Laying this groundwork prevents misalignment, accelerates vendor comparisons, and reduces the risk of selecting tools that don’t scale.
Create a collaborative buying process that brings together IT, finance, security, legal, and business stakeholders to evaluate the tool from multiple angles. Each group can contribute unique insights:
Using this shared decision-making model reduces blind spots and ensures selected tools serve long-term organizational goals.
Evaluate several vendors for a thorough comparison of product capabilities, pricing structures, and implementation requirements.
Request hands-on evaluation through demos, pilots, or trial access so stakeholders can validate usability, confirm performance expectations, and uncover limitations that may not appear in marketing materials.
Collect structured feedback to help your teams objectively evaluate vendors and maintain transparency throughout the selection process.
Price is one component of a much larger negotiation strategy. You also need to evaluate and negotiate:
Address these elements to retain control over organizational data, maintain predictable cost structures, and avoid restrictive terms that lead to vendor lock-in. Negotiate holistically for a more favorable long-term partnership.
SaaS optimization is an ongoing process. Monitor usage trends, license allocation, and application adoption to determine whether tools still align with needs. Continuous review helps:
Real-world data shows how much you can save by monitoring usage and cleaning up underutilized tools.
Adobe uncovered about $60 million in savings and avoidance after gaining full visibility into its SaaS stack. REA Group identified over $550,000 in savings opportunities, while Talkdesk completed 24 negotiations in six months, resulting in $347,000 in annual savings and $561,000 in total savings. Clear insights make these kinds of outcomes possible for you.
You need visibility into applications, spend, contracts, and usage. A SaaS Management Platform (SMP) helps you and your team:
Bringing an SMP into your procurement workflow makes it easier to see what’s happening across your stack and make informed decisions without the heavy administrative lift. They give you clearer insights and free up time for IT and procurement teams to focus on higher-value work.
Modern procurement teams rely on technology to:
A SaaS Management Platform is a system of record for SaaS that provides automated insights and workflows that help procurement teams manage software intake and renewals.
SMPs provide:
With an SMP, procurement, IT, and finance teams stay more aligned. It allows you to govern purchasing more effectively, enforce standards consistently, and keep your stack tied to your organization’s goals.

An SMP helps procurement teams improve operational efficiency and reduce wasted spend. Key benefits include:
SaaS Management Platforms are especially helpful when you’re facing rapid application growth, rising SaaS costs, or a lot of decentralized purchasing. By adopting an SMP into your procurement stack, you gain a smoother, more modern way to manage procurement, reduce manual work, and make confident decisions grounded in real data.
A strong governance model provides the structure you need to manage SaaS purchases with confidence. It requires you to:
When expectations are clear and the right people are involved at the right time, you can reduce risk, avoid unnecessary tools, and help your organization make smarter decisions.
Begin your governance process with clear, accessible policies that show your teams exactly how to request and evaluate new SaaS tools. A standard procurement workflow helps:
Since SaaS decisions touch multiple parts of the business, it helps to define each stakeholder’s role before requests start flowing in. This structure prevents bottlenecks and helps your teams give every tool the right level of scrutiny:
When responsibilities are clear, you avoid confusion about who approves what and ensure no purchase slips through without proper review.
Governance only works when everyone understands how it helps them. The right training gives your teams a clear picture of why the process exists and what can go wrong when they ignore it—from security gaps to unnecessary spend. It will also help them see how a consistent workflow actually speeds things up and gets them the right tools with less friction.
Use clear, ongoing communication to reinforce these expectations and guide employees toward approved purchasing paths. Once people understand that the process protects both the organization and its budget, they’re much more likely to follow it.
If you’re looking for a clearer way to manage your SaaS footprint, gain visibility into renewals, and reduce the waste hidden across your stack, a purpose-built platform can simplify the work. Zylo gives you a centralized view of your applications, usage, contracts, and vendors so you can make better decisions at every stage of procurement.
With that level of visibility, you can:
If you want to see how a centralized system of record can support your goals, request a demo to explore what’s possible.

Table of Contents ToggleWhat Is a SaaS Savings Pipeline?Why Managing SaaS...

Table of Contents ToggleWhat FinOps Means in the Modern Cloud EnvironmentWhy...

Table of Contents ToggleKey TakeawaysWhat Is SaaS Procurement?Key Benefits of Effective...

Table of Contents ToggleKey TakeawaysWhat Is SaaS Procurement?Key Benefits of Effective...
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |